I decided that before I could properly start designing my own typeface I would need to look more in-depth and serif and sans serif fonts and decide which one I would rather use. To begin with, I thought that I would design a serif font, as these are easier to hand draw, as well as, in my opinion, are slightly more interesting.
Below is a breakdown of the different styles of serif and sans serif fonts.
Serif
A serif is a small line attached to the end of a stroke on a letter of symbol. They are usually linked to Latin and Roman origins and are the preferred font type for long text as it is seen as being easier to read than sans serif.
There are different styles of serif fonts, old style, transitional, didone, slab, clarendon and glyphic.
Old Style – They are characterised by a lack of difference between thick and thin lines, as well as that the thinnest parts of the letters are at an angle rather than at the top or the bottom. The serifs in the old style are usually bracketed and head serifs are often angled. E.g. Garamond
Transitional – The differences between the thick and thin lines are larger than in the old style font but less so than modern serif fonts. Serifs are still bracketed and head serifs are oblique. E.g. Baskerville
Didone – The contrast between thick and thin strokes is obvious and dramatic. Usually, the end of the stroke is finished with a ‘ball terminal’, as opposed to the angled end of old style and transitional. E.g. Bodoni Classic
Slab – These fonts have very heavy serifs, they look very similar to sans serif fonts but with the added serif. There is generally no obvious difference between stroke sizes. E.g. Rockwell
Clarendon – There is a minimal difference between the stroke contrast and the serifs tend to be short-medium length. E.g. Bookman
Glyphic – Again, there is very minimal difference in stroke sizes. It is often characterised by the triangular-shaped serifs. E.g. Albertus

Sans Serif
Sans serif fonts are characterised by the absence of the serif. They tend to have less line width variations than serif fonts.
The different styles of sans serif are explained below:
Grotesque – The first type of grotesque usually has an obvious contrast in stroke weight as well as a slightly squared look to any curves. More modern grotesque fonts show less of a difference in stroke weigh and are less rounded. However, both use the ‘bowl and loop’ g. E.g. Helvetica
Square – These fonts have dramatic squaring of usually rounded areas. E.g. Eurostile
Geometric – These are influenced by geometric shapes and are generally less readable than grotesque fonts. E.g. Futura
Humanistic – There is an apparent difference between stroke weights. They often match characteristics with serif fonts but with a more calligraphic influence. E.g. Gill Sans

After researching both serif and sans serif, I still think that I would rather design a serif font as I could have more variation and play with it more. Although from this research, I could mix the geometric shapes and the general shapes of sans serif fonts with the serifs to see what could happen.